Hi Mariano,���� �� �� it is supossed to be Posix, but Posix.1, it's another revision.Since Solaris 10, it is supposed to supports all extensions of Posix (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5175/standards-5/index.html) and Irix 6 (is discontinued, and is not Posix.1 compatible)Also I can say that the GHC (Haskell) implementation assumes the value 1 for the constant, you can check the source code in:I think is enough safe to have the 1 as a constant, if not you will have to generate a plugin for every platform.��
The other alternative is to read the constant value from the C Header, but is maybe an overkill.
Chers,Pd: hace rato que estoy por aca, pero me cuesta responder, a veces va muy rapido y otras vuelan muy alto :).
--On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:24 PM, tesonep@gmail.com <tesonep@gmail.com> wrote:Hello Mariano,���� �� ��WNOHANG is a constant is defined in sys/wait.h, after the compilation is not included in the object file.��You will have to duplicate its value in the Smalltalk Code. It's value is 1, in linux is defined in��bits/waitflags.h as��#define WNOHANG 1mmmmmm but then I would need to take care about its different values in different OS right?��I am reading for example this thread:��https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.python/_5rCpfYR_ZE�� �� ��sunos 4.1.3 �� �� : #define WNOHANG 1
����������������Solaris 2.4 �� �� : #define WNOHANG 0100
����������������OSF1 2.0����������������: #define WNOHANG 0x1
����������������Ultrix 4.4����������������: #define WNOHANG 1
����������������irix 4.0.5C �� �� : #define WNOHANG 0x1
����������������irix 5.2 �� �� �� ��: #define WNOHANG 0100
����������������irix 6.0.1 �� �� ��: #define WNOHANG 0100OK..the thread is from 1995... I thought the POSIX standard would standardize that...I am now checking at��/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk/usr/include/sys/wait.hand it says:#define WNOHANG 0x00000001
But again..I wonder how portable is to stick to that...��Ok...maybe I will need to go with a VM primitive as #primGetChildExitStatus: �� that way I can do the:self cCode: 'waitpid ( pidToHandle, &exitStatus, WNOHANG )'�� inSmalltalk: [ exitStatus := -1 ].pd: que groso Pablito verte por aca!!!!��Cheers,Pablo--On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:Hi guys,Say I want to call to waitpid like this:waitpid(childID, &status, WNOHANG);How can I do since I don't have access to WNOHANG int value in order to send it via argument .... ???Any idea?Thanks in advance,��
--��Pablo Tesone.
tesonep@gmail.com--
Pablo Tesone.
tesonep@gmail.com