On 16 Jan 2010, at 01:17, John M McIntosh wrote:
> Personally I think you need to add an entry.
>
> I am currently am doing a statistical study in this area for a
> client, of course not all of the data/solution will flow back to the
> community unless agreed to by the client,
> however I'll supply some numbers & thoughts to take us from the 1996
> values into 2010. Also there will an active memory policy that will
> adjust some things to avoid
> some interesting edge cases as an example of the solution that lurks.
>
> On 2010-01-15, at 6:19 PM,
csrabak@bol.com.br wrote:
>
>> I would only add the item if we could agree these parameters are to
>> used with such frequency to make the addition worthwhile.
>>
>> Do more users of Pharo feel in need to tweak these parameters
>> before delivering their projects to users in production?
>>
>> --
>> Cesar Rabak
>
> --
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <
johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> � Twitter:
> squeaker68882
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. �http://
>
www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>