> IMHO, underneath the windows theme argument is the question of the GUI 
<br/>&gt; look and feel instability Pharo suffers from one release to another one, 
<br/>&gt; this ruin a bit the idea of people willing to design desktop 
<br/>&gt; application[1] with Pharo, where consistency in this department is more 
<br/>&gt; or less needed. In another hand Phobos may be a better choice then. 
<br/><br/>If I was developing an app where a stable look and feel was necessary, and I wasn���t using my own widgets, I would maintain my own theme. AFAIK nothing about the theme /framework/ has changed, just individual themes are no longer part of core.

	
	
	<div class="signature" style="margin-top:1em;color:#666666;font-size:11px;">
				Cheers,
<br/>Sean
			</div>
<br/><hr align="left" width="300" />
View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/Pharo-4-Beta-first-impressions-tp4817257p4817391.html">Re: Pharo 4 Beta, first impressions</a><br/>
Sent from the <a href="http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html">Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive</a> at Nabble.com.<br/>