On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Renggli
<renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it would be better to have ConfigurationOfRefactoring and two
> other: ConfigurationOfOB and ConfigurationOfO2, which have the former
> as a required project (and IIUC it was your first intention, right?).
> This will reduce duplication of dependencies between projects.
O2 breaks OB, if both are loaded. I suggest that the configurations
should trigger a conflict when somebody tries to load both.
Lukas. Could you give me more details please? Look. This is the part of the latest script we used to generate the dev image:
Gofer new
��� wiresong: 'ob';
��� addPackage: 'OmniBrowser';
��� addPackage: 'OB-Morphic';
��� addPackage: 'OB-Standard';
��� addPackage: 'OB-Refactory';
��� addPackage: 'OB-Regex';
��� addPackage: 'OB-SUnitIntegration';
��� addPackage: 'OB-Shout';
��� load.
Gofer new
��� squeaksource: 'EnhancedOB';
��� addPackage: 'OmniBrowser2';
��� addPackage: 'O2-Standard';
��� addPackage: 'O2-Morphic';
��� addPackage: 'O2-Enhancements';
��� addPackage: 'OCForO2';
��� addPackage: 'O2-Refactory';
��� load.
�
And there we are loading things from OB and O2. And the image don't seems to be "broken".
Thanks.
Mariano
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch