I was a great talk. I had to run because I forgot my appointment to the doctor.��

Now some points

- first a meta point: we should check how we can get more people following the talks.

Now related to bloc/bricks

- we should pay really attention to the maintenance and deployment of the external libraries (I could ****never**** install GTK on my mac using darwin. Sure you can experiment but I think that bloc without a widget layer is a nice stuff but not usable.��

- what is the oldest machine it is working? What is the entrance barrier in terms of cost?

- So since you are basically two where is the roadmap? What is your visibility in terms of % of your time on the project because at the end of the day you should earn money.��

- The question of the patterns used to build the widgets is important. The question of how to validate it for real is also important.��

- Do you plan commenting/cleaning categorisation for real? I still do not get how you can design something without writing the assumptions of the design into class comments.��

Then with such systematic lack of comments you cannot benefit from the "no broken window effect". Now this is more if I see a comments it is either old, bad or useless "I'm an abstract class". At least it was like that the last time I checked. And they are certainly many many concerns that are hidden everywhere and are undocumented.��

- How do you want to get people involved? To me this is totally unclear. Especially with the previous point in mind. I mean for real not just "oh yes we need users"

Stef