I'm not sure how closely my contribution workflow matches the standard advertised, so just wanted to share it for feedback.�� I may remember wrongly, but my understanding of the advertised process was forking the "pharo-project/pharo" repo, then cloning from my fork.�� However I found it awkward to keep the "master" branch of my fork synchronised with upstream.

What I ended up finding easiest is *always* cloning "pharo-project/pharo" then adding my "bencoman/pharo" repo as a remote.�� Iceberg then makes it simple to push just my working branches to my fork from where I can issue a PR.�� I never need to trouble synchronising the master branch in��my fork.

How does that compare to your contribution workflow?

cheers -ben