I have another problem is:
� � � �imagine we do not match category to package so this means that users will have to add explicitly their categories
� � � �to the package

� � � �So I load Foo

� � � �I get the contents of
� � � � � � � �Foo and Foo-B � categories into RPackage Foo.

� � � �I save Foo and it save the classes in Foo and Foo-B (categories are not considered just rpackage contents)

Now
� � � �I add a category Foo-C (because the browser let me do it)
� � � � � � � �-> may be system should ask me: do you want to add to the Foo RPackage?
� � � � � � � �-> may be I should do it explicitly

Better is that we have a browser only showing RPackages

Then what happen if I add a new class Zork in Foo-C

The class category will be Foo-C and again does the system has to check in which package it should put the class?
How do I map Zork class?
� � � �-> explicitly?
� � � �-> What happens if I do it via a browser only showing classes and categories?


So the mapping Category to package is not that bad else we will have to check *****ALL***** the time
if a class should be put in a package or not and compare category with package names.
And we will have all the crap of matching with sub subc.... most specific categories....

So I would like to community to react to this mail because this is important and people will get frustrated after.

I think that a one to one mapping to category is a good idea.
+ having a browser just showing packages would be good.

Then we can after have a browser that show categories as tags and sort the classes accordingly.

So people please thing a bit because I want to make progress and losing my time is boring.


Stef