On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Michael Roberts
<mike@mjr104.co.uk> wrote:
without its own update stream, or section in the update file, I think
the effect of allowing the Pharo image to update itself based on the
core update file would lead to an undefined result?
Yes. Mostly due to overrides.
�
If that is the case I would disable it.
I assume this would be replaced by some Metacello 'update stream' ?
That's a good idea. I am not sure how to implement it, but for sure, it will be in a future ;)� Maybe 1.1
�
cheers,
Mike
2010/1/10 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
> It is a simple question. Do we allow that or not.� Miguel wrote the pros and
> cons:
>
> Pros
> - Can fix bugs after release
> - Can aply improvements to the image after release.
>
> Cons
> - Can mess the image of someone by overwriting some overridden method.
> - Can accidentally update more than intended in someone's image
>
>
> We have to take a decision.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project