On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Michael Roberts <mike@mjr104.co.uk> wrote:
without its own update stream, or section in the update file, I think
the effect of allowing the Pharo image to update itself based on the
core update file would lead to an undefined result?


Yes. Mostly due to overrides.
If that is the case I would disable it.

I assume this would be replaced by some Metacello 'update stream' ?


That's a good idea. I am not sure how to implement it, but for sure, it will be in a future ;)� Maybe 1.1
cheers,
Mike

2010/1/10 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
> It is a simple question. Do we allow that or not.� Miguel wrote the pros and
> cons:
>
> Pros
> - Can fix bugs after release
> - Can aply improvements to the image after release.
>
> Cons
> - Can mess the image of someone by overwriting some overridden method.
> - Can accidentally update more than intended in someone's image
>
>
> We have to take a decision.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project