On 17 Mar 2015, at 16:22, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:


On 17 Mar 2015, at 16:19, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:



2015-03-17 16:07 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:

> On 17 Mar 2015, at 15:59, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
> All class comments seem to have been modified ?
> Was that intentional ?
>

I think that is an overside of the GIT commit: it commits the comment it gets, and this is the template when there is none.

This also means that those classes appear as having been commented, even if they weren�t.

not really� they are still marked as �uncommented� in the image.
I really don�t know why the export showed as commented, thought� I suppose a bug in the exporter. 


bad implementation (no, interesting design decision):

comment
"Answer the receiver's comment. (If missing, supply a template) "
| aString |
aString := self instanceSide organization classComment.
aString isEmpty ifFalse: [^ aString].
^self classCommentBlank


I would return nil there and let the tools handle the template.

(ah, and that the comment is stored on the organisation is of course strange too�)

Marcus