Why are we not using 3DICC Terf for these?
Would work wonderfully.
We can have a persistent area, sound and webcam support, slides, ....
Ron, how would it work cost wise for the Pharo Consortium to handle meetings in your servers?
Phil
Well, on the one hand this would be super cool. On the other hand nobody will listen to the meeting because everyone's playing with terf :)
Norbert
> Am 09.09.2016 um 08:51 schrieb Ron Teitelbaum <ron@usmedrec.com>:
>
> Terf?�� www.3dicc.com
>
> Ron Teitelbaum
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-bounces@lists.pharo.org ] On Behalf Of Esteban Lorenzano
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 2:47 AM
> To: Pharo Development List
> Subject: [Pharo-dev] [OFF-TOPIC] looking for your wisdom... video conference service?
>
> Hi,
>
> In the board we decided that we need to have a better support for public meetings (particularly for consortium meetings but also for others).
> So we wanted to explore other services that would allow is more than 10 persons participating (this limit is annoying).
> Now, I know google hangouts was able to provide more than 10 connections (paying), but now I do not find it��� maybe I was mistaken?
> Do you have any other service we can try?
>
> Thanks,
> Esteban
>
>