2009/10/29 George Herolyants
<george.herolyants@gmail.com>
> For me it's not clear at all. But this is much more obvious:
>
> �� � �� stack := self resultOf: [self shouldBeEmpty].
>
So why to use a block then? And stop, why to use "resultOf:"???
For the same reason the execution of the test was being wrapped by original #given: (maybe we have to ask author?)
�
�
>> And by "declarative" I meant
>> the way you specify dependencies between your tests. If it was done
>> your way, test would be performed twice.
>
> Why?
Don't you expect the block to be evaluated?
>>
>> If you use symbol, you don't
>> have to do it (haven't seen the library yet, just guessing :).
>
> Don't have to do what?
Don't have to execute method shouldBeEmpty twice.