2014-12-04 8:27 GMT+01:00 Max Leske
<maxleske@gmail.com>:
That�s because they should be superseded by the libgit2 bindings.
If I'm not mistaken, they originally were what Ben suggested: a complete git reimplementation in Smalltalk via a FileSystem abstraction layer. The Pharo "whole" export to github would be based on that work, along with that 'almost like FileTree, but not the same' file format.
But correct me if I got that wrong.
it was Camillo�s work/idea, not Ben�s.
and well, it was a great idea, but never more than an experiment.
I wanted it too, but I didn�t continue the work because it would be different from monticello and community has proved been refractory to ideas that goes further it.
so I get back to the other idea (Yours, Max) which was made monticello work with git. It will not be complete, but it will be a start.
not that I have had actually time to work on it, but I will continue Max work as soon as I can allocate some time.
Esteban
Thanks for the reminder (and the hard work you're putting into the libgit2 bindings),
Thierry