Bret Victor's talk is certainly interesting. This got me thinking...
What we need is a modern-day PARC with a /next generation/ of visionaries to
advance Smalltalk. They would carry on the work that was begun four decades
ago.
Here's the thing:�� The Smalltalk environment has not fundamentally changed
or improved since the Xerox PARC days. We've been tweaking the design here
and there, but nothing groundbreaking has happened.
Is the current Smalltalk environment the /final word/ on the nature of
dynamic programming and humane representation of thought? I seriously doubt
it.
Who are the visionaries that will shake things up? How do we find them?
Let's face it:�� We've all become rather complacent. (With the exception of
Newspeak, which frankly doesn't impress me much. *We don't need a new
language!*)
This is something Smalltalk Renaissance should think about.Much said and done in Pharo, there is nothing stopping any group in creating something more powerful / relevant and leave the footprints in the sands of time more firmly etched. I agree again there is lot of scope provided that group does it..
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Renaissance-Program-tp4797112p4797243.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.