Second some features were bad so not copied and pasted to Rubric.
Life is complex.
And we try our best.
But I did not want to say to Alain: ���too bad you work a lot but now we do not care��� because we care a lot
about other contributions.
Stef
On 2 Apr 2019, at 17:43, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:36 PM Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
> On 2 Apr 2019, at 17:30, ducasse <stepharo@netcourrier.com> wrote:
>
> Cool and thanks!
> I love this green bar and I will try to keep it green.
> Do you know if the test writing by pierre should be pushed in Pharo because I have the impression that they will be red first
>
If we add failing tests, then *everyone* is impacted. Instead of ���ah, green��� we will again have to manually check
*every* *single* Pull request. And we, again, will forget to do it. And thus break even more.
I really think keeping the tests green is very, very much better for everyone.Yes Marcus, but there is another "hidden" point in my mail: my fix was really simple, anybody could have done it.So- just complaining does not fix the build.- removing breaking tests will not guarantee us a better quality either
Marcus
--
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de LilleCRIStAL - UMR 9189French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.frPhone: +33 06 52 70 66 13
