El dom., 14 de jun. de 2015 a la(s) 3:06 a. m., stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> escribi��:

Le 10/6/15 20:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a ��crit :
>> On 10 Jun 2015, at 15:13, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
>>
>> This is in the entreprise book. I added a subsection on comments.
>> May be I committed but forgot to push.
>> Now I did it.
> And now I see it.
> I made a small change.
super!

>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> Le 9/6/15 21:50, Sven Van Caekenberghe a ��crit :
>>> Where exactly can I find what you changed ?
>>> I don't see any commit of you on github ...
>>>
>>>> On 09 Jun 2015, at 20:10, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 9/6/15 20:06, stepharo a ��crit :
>>>>> I will update the STON chapter :)
>>>> Done :)
>>>>
>>>>> Le 8/6/15 23:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a ��crit :
>>>>>> I would do it like this: use a wrapping stream to skip comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>> Name: STON-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.59
>>>>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
>>>>>> Time: 8 June 2015, 11:34:32.886167 pm
>>>>>> UUID: 7ab942b5-9d1a-44c3-9d58-da29feb72380
>>>>>> Ancestors: STON-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.58
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add experimental STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream and tests
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>> Name: STON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54
>>>>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
>>>>>> Time: 8 June 2015, 11:34:52.918771 pm
>>>>>> UUID: 3dcb2c9c-6efe-4d62-bf36-3bbe91f09d08
>>>>>> Ancestors: STON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.53
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add experimental STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream and tests
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you can do as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> STON fromStream: (STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream on: 'Point[/* this is X*/ 1, /* this is Y*/ 2] // Nice huh ?' readStream).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>�� => 1@2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> STON fromStream: (STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream on: '// Here is how you create a point:
>>>>>> Point[
>>>>>>�� // this is X
>>>>>>�� 1,
>>>>>>�� // this is Y
>>>>>>�� 2 ]
>>>>>> // Nice huh ?' readStream).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>�� => 1@2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This helper class would be useable in other contexts too (like NeoJSON).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The advantage is that it does not change the STON (or JSON) syntax itself, it just add some functionality for those who want it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: this probably needs some more testing
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:03, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@inria.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> writes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not so sure we should add that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The JSON spec explicitly does not allow comments because of fear of abuse (that the comments would be used to add semantic meaning outside the spec).
>>>>>>>> really? That's surprising. Comments in configuration files are very
>>>>>>>> important. Even more when the configuration files are templates for new
>>>>>>>> users.
>>>>>>> I know some people are using STON in ways that I did not originally anticipate, that is of course cool, but writing configuration files was not the original goal. STON is a version of JSON that is closer to our object model.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like I said, I will think about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Damien Cassou
>>>>>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
>>>>>>>> losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>