From: St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr;
lenglish5@cox.net
Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012, 19:03
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] keeping up with lively-kernel (morphic)
On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Lawson English wrote:
> Does Pharo use Morphic? Is there a conscious decision on people's parts to NOT try and keep the various flavors of Morphic compatible, or is it just "too hard," or that people don't care, or think it irrelevant?
>
> Some graphical frameworks manage to keep a centralized core of classes because they are created by one group of people for one language and then bindings ported to other languages. Morphic is unique in that it is being [re]implemented in 3 different languages: Self, Smalltalk (with several variations within that branch) and JavaScript. Is there any way, or even desire, to coordinate between the differing
versions?
are you serious?
Please can we continue to build our future instead of talking about the one of others?
Stef