Because you don't know the tricks... This one should be just fine
True basicNew ifTrue: [ "some code" ] yourself
2013/6/26 Cl�ment Bera <bera.clement@gmail.com>
True basicNew ifTrue: [ "some code" ]hehe raises NonBooleanReceiver :)2013/6/26 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com>
why not, let's "forbid" them with an error message!
=> maybe you can and error to #become: on nil / true / false as well?
On 2013-06-26, at 14:20, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
> Boolean new � � � �-> error
> Boolean basicNew � -> is possible
>
> should we care?
>--
Cl�ment B�raMate Virtual Machine EngineerB�timent B 40, avenue Halley 59650�Villeneuve d'Ascq