Hi Ben

if we would just like to increase the number of cases/issues
using a "case per class" would have been better.
Adding final quality improvements (like docu) is usual before releases
not only in the ST world.

For the reasons:
A single person can only do it step by step and therefore I
used the granularity of projects/packages. This also helps reintegration
/mergin back into external managed parts.
There was no reaction onto my call for action from others.

So instead of grumbling afterwards better use your keyboard to comment on
classes ;)

Thx
T.

> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 06. Februar 2014 um 10:43 Uhr
> Von: btc@openinworld.com

> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>

> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] comments :)

>
> Good work. Minor thing though - could they maybe grouped under one Case.
> I'd hate for someone to look at the massive amount work done for Pharo 3
> indicated by the cases close and think "Its just lots of comment updates"
> Sure it would end up being a long running case - with a lot of slices
> (each based off the most recent image). You'd have to see how that
> panned out, and itf it got too long, just link to a new case for the
> next group.
> Or maybe there is some difficulty that I can't forsee.
> cheers -ben
>
> Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> > Still 1017 to go. Feel free to help:
> >
> > � �Smalltalk allClasses select: [:each | each comment includesSubstring: 'xxxx' ]
> >
> > External Package owners should also reintegrate too so these do not
> > get lost when a new version of external packages get integrated.
> > (for instance https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12812 for Spec)
> >
> > step by step it goes ...
> >
> > Bye
> > T.
> >
> >
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. Februar 2014 um 08:36 Uhr
> > Von: Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef@free.fr>
> > An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>
> > Betreff: [Pharo-dev] comments :)
> >
> > Thanks for all these comments!
> >
> >
> > On 05 Feb 2014, at 00:27, GitHub <noreply@github.com> wrote: 30742
> > 12794 Class comments missing in UpdateStreamer package
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12794[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12794]
> >
> > 12802 Class comments missing for Kernel package
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12802[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12802]
> >
> > 12804 Class comment missing in AST packages
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12804[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12804]
> >
> > 12797 Class comments missing for tools package
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12797[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12797]
> >
> > 12796 Class comments missing for Traits package
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12796[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12796]
> >
> > 12798 Class comments missing in GroupManager package
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12798[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12798]
> >
> > 12806 Class comment missing in package FreeType + categorizing for FreeTypeCacheTest
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12806[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12806]
> >
> > 12800 EyeContextInspector should be renamed to EyeMethodContextInspector
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12800[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12800]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>