Hi Stan, To my��knowledge��there is no ESUG list yet but I have to say that I was just wondering the same thing since Janko and Mariano now have to cross-post to communicate any GSoC messages for those not using Nabble. �� Maybe ESUG can create a Google Group so I can add it to Nabble too?<div>

<br></div><div>Cheers, Geert</div><div><br></div><div>ps. I have contacted Nabble support to see if we can add the usenets��<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">comp.lang.smalltalk,��</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">ibm.software.vasmalltalk��and��comp.lang.smalltalk.dolphin to Nabble.</span><div>

<br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 March 2010 15:10, Stan Shepherd [via Smalltalk] <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="http://n4.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1589021&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">[hidden email]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

Hi Geert, is there a separate ESUG list that is not under your Smalltalk Nabble umbrella yet? 
<br><br>The Google SOC thing got very confusing very quickly; depending on who is subscribed to which list, you may or may not see bits of a thread. (less of an issue if you&#39;re viewing on Nabble). Do we need an overall Smalltalk list to be used in cases like this? 
<br><br>...Stan

</blockquote></div><br></div></div>

<br><hr align="left" width="300">
View this message in context: <a href="http://n4.nabble.com/For-those-who-use-Nabble-tp1310998p1589021.html">Re: For those who use Nabble .... Universal Smalltalk list?</a><br>
Sent from the <a href="http://n4.nabble.com/Pharo-Smalltalk-f1294837.html">Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive</a> at Nabble.com.<br>