On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:

Yes, we have a 1.0 and a 1.1 stream now (actually since the sprint in
Lille).

Yes I know that.

I'm integrating remaining critical fixes for 1.0, while Stef and the
other integrators have started working on 1.1. I don't think it's too
early at all. It allows us to keep the pace to move forward with new
stuff, while stabilizing and afterwards maintaining the 1.0 release.

Yes, but this is done just with separating the streams in 1.0 and 1.1. What I don't know if it is ok is to put alpha to 1.1.

I mean, when you tag something with alpha it means it is almost done and there are some bugs yet. But I think the job to be done for 1.1 is far more than just a couple of bugs. Maybe I wrong.

But it sound strange to me to see a RC of one version and an alpha of the following at the same time.

Cheers

Mariano

Just as a reminder, here are the main goals we have set for 1.1:

- New preferences system
- Integrate Alien
- Improve code quality (e.g., make selected Lint tests pass)
- Continuous integration system

(http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones)

Cheers,
Adrian

On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:15 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> mmmmmmm are we already in 1.1 alpha ??? isn't it to early ?
>
> Best
>
> Mariano
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Denker <denker@acm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/24734/PharoCore-1.1-11035-alpha.zip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project