Great. Thanks Doru. 100 minute turn around. wow! :)
Its 2AM here so I'll try it out tomorrow.

Now sorry I forgot to mention that both these forms
* Collection>>#do:
*��Collection>>do:
would be useful since individuals vary their use in documentation. Actually I mostly use the latter, but the case that sparked the post used the former.

cheers -ben


On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com> wrote:
Excellent!

Thank you Tudor.
Esteban A. Maringolo


2015-02-10 14:00 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Indeed. Nice idea. Available in the latest GT-SpotterExtensions-Core:
> Name: GT-SpotterExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.57
> Author: TudorGirba
> Time: 10 February 2015, 5:59:41.775209 pm
> UUID: 7de47651-7d17-44cd-ac70-467955fa903c
> Ancestors: GT-SpotterExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.56
>
> added spotter for concrete method reference like:
> Collection>>#do: (thanks Ben for the suggestion)
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
>>
>> When I am reading Fogbugz issues, often there are method references using
>> the common convention "MCDefinitionIndex>>#add: for a fully defined
>> reference.
>>
>> It would be nice to be able to copy/paste that fully defined reference
>> into Spotter and get delivered straight to that method.�� You might still
>> list other implementors of the method, but the fully defined reference would
>> be at the top, or somehow highlighted.
>>
>> I might get around to trying to code this myself, but I mention it in case
>> it catches the interest of Spotter core team.
>>
>> cheers -ben
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"