On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:

Yes, there is a version number mismatch. But I do not feel this is that important. On some point, version number should be extracted from Git metadata, and not from a simple counter.

Well, I does confuses me, because the idea of GitFileTree is to integrate git into the image. So if I browse with MC and that does not match at all what I committed via MC itself too, then that is confusing. At least for me.�� For that a case, I would prefer to commit , push, pull etc everything by hand and that would be clearer.��

��

By the way, what is a ��subprocess��?

It's name I gave to the project I started (the one I send the survey), it's called (at least so far) OSSubprocess. This is easy because one can think it's quite close to OSProcess (which is true). It seems Python does have similar names:��https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html

If you have a better name I am all ears :)��

Alexandre

> On Jan 3, 2016, at 1:04 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> When I commit from MC, I see the generated commit, with something like OSSubprocess-MarianoMartinezPeck.7. However, when�� browse the repository later from MC, I get that such a commit is displayed as OSSubprocess-MarianoMartinezPeck.4 (the rest of the commit message maps correctly).
>
> Could this offset be because of the first initial 3 commits? That is, initial git commit from github, and 2 commits of�� "gitfiletree repository properties".
>
> Is there a workaround here so that both could map correctly?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel�� http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com