On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Benoit St-Jean wrote:
> How about :
>
> become: nil
>
> :)
>
> -----------------
> Benoit St-Jean
> A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero.
> (Albert Einstein)
>
>
>
>
> From:
bschwab@anest.ufl.edu
> To:
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:56:28 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Is Object>>name important?
>
> Zap, kill, obliterate, destroy, etc., simultaneously :)
>
>
> From:
pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:
pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Hernan Wilkinson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:46 PM
> To:
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Is Object>>name important?
>
> the same happens to me all the time... so I do as if it does not exist :-), I just override it... I agree it should not be Object's protocol.
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM, St�phane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
> ideally I would love to get rid of it and externalName and friends.... now
> there are probably deep reasons for now.
>
> Stef
>
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Time to time, I need to create a #name method on my class. But I found a bit ugly to do an override.
> > Is Object>>name that important?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alexandre
> > --
> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > Alexandre Bergel �
http://www.bergel.eu
> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> >
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>