2015-07-26 15:49 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:

Hi,

Well, If there wouldn't be already a way to do it, I wouldn't care which one to take. But this is not the case: we are discussing the introduction of a new vocabulary when there is already another who is fulfilling the place.
In that sense, the proposed method solves a problem who is actually not there.
If we do not like #<<, then we should remove it from system, but please, let's not add a more limited method when we have a more generic one who does the job...

<< is horrible, it reminds me to std::cout in C++ and all those cryptic languages where you cannot write a line without checking the API reference manual.

Hern��n