But for example, OB must work in Squeak also, not only Pharo. If we fork OB we will then merge both of them.
At some point does it make sense to move the tools (OB etc) into the
core so that we don't have folk working around them not being there? I
don't believe such fragmentation of tools helps us long term.
Thanks
Mike
On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Frederic Pluquet <fpluquet@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre@bergel.eu> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> It looks really good. I tried to used it instead of the Explorer.
> Few comments:
> �� � � �- Unfolding a branch that contains an element with a very very long
> printOn: seems to freeze the system.
> Ok, I should limit the size of the generated string (with ... at the end).
>
> I got an error niDescription not�found.
> Do you have an example I can reproduce ?
>
> �� � � - I spend a lot of time in unfolding branches to see field content.
> Maybe field values could be displayed without having to unfold ?
> Good idea. I'll see what I can do.
> Cheers,
> Fr�d
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project