But for example, OB must work in Squeak also, not only Pharo. If we fork OB we will then merge both of them.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Michael Roberts <mike@mjr104.co.uk> wrote:
At some point does it make sense to move the tools (OB etc) into the
core so that we don't have folk working around them not being there? I
don't believe such fragmentation of tools helps us long term.
Thanks
Mike
On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Frederic Pluquet <fpluquet@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre@bergel.eu> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> It looks really good. I tried to used it instead of the Explorer.
> Few comments:
> �� � � �- Unfolding a branch that contains an element with a very very long
> printOn: seems to freeze the system.
> Ok, I should limit the size of the generated string (with ... at the end).
>
> I got an error niDescription not�found.
> Do you have an example I can reproduce ?
>
> �� � � - I spend a lot of time in unfolding branches to see field content.
> Maybe field values could be displayed without having to unfold ?
> Good idea. I'll see what I can do.
> Cheers,
> Fr�d
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project