Le 19 f�vr. 2014 � 13:32, Norbert Hartl a �crit :
Is anybody using Versionner in 3.0? I would be really interested in some success reports. In my case I cannot achieve much with it.
People just start to use Versionner since it was integrated lately (vm problem).
I really don�t get when it is creating a baseline version and when a static version. Releasing a valid baseline produces a static version that looks good but also it creates a new baseline. Why?
baseline = dev version
numbered version = release
A project evolves or is ... dead (kind of).
That's why a new development version is always generated after a release.
I had a discussion with Damien this morning. He argued that Versionner should be able to able to reuse baselines until there is a change to this baseline ... and is right (need to work on that).
To avoid problems, Versionner now always create a new baseline for the next development version.
Because creating a baseline in any of my projects lead to a bogus configuration. Versionner rewrites project dependency wrongly (projects are named after configurations and not after names I give them. loads: directives are stripped off but references in the rest of the configuration are not changed accordingly).
I will work on this one tomorrow.
In my current project it creates a baseline with the same version as a static version that already exists.
static version => release
It is a shame because it looks so good but all the funtionalities do not work in my projects except �commit the project�. I hope I�m doing something wrong but then I downloaded a fresh pharo 3.0 this morning and loaded my config and went from there.
Are there some other bugs not reported?
How to proceed? What kind of test case should I deliver. I think Versionner is pretty important and I should be usable in 3.0.