I can see how that makes sense for now - we will continue to make suggestions and then over time maybe we can help curate it it becomes too much. Although I am worried that this can create a lot of work - both to report and fix?
 
In the meantime how do you prefer we submit changes, in Markdown format (does that help?) - or is RTF better?  OR - is there any way we can commit proposed changes - which you can review and publish (e.g. could we use a Git Repo?). I'm not familiar with the underlying technology of Pharo.org - but could we modify it so there is a discussion page like on Wikipedia where changes can be proposed and applied by you?
 
This sounds like a great BOF topic at ESUG - and maybe we should follow up on that?
 
At the moment I can see numerous tiny fixes (grammatical and formatting - that are more time consuming to report than just fix).
 
For now, can you apply the newer fixes I proposed (to undo Stef's misunderstanding for my "use link" suggestion).
 
I also think on the http://pharo.org/download page we should mention the PharoLauncher project (http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/PharoLauncher) - its really handy for managing multiple images (and getting the latest image).
 
tim
 
 
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, at 01:14 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
Hi, 
 
We love to have contributions, but for the moment being (to try to keep the design, etc. and prevent too much disorder� which was a problem in the previous site). 
I would prefer you to send me your contributions (or post it here), and I will upload them to the site. 
 
cheers, 
Esteban
 
On 08 Aug 2014, at 12:11, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
 
 
Yes - it would be better to link to the YouTube  version in the text.
 
So how is the Pharo.org site generated? Is this what Pillar is? (Is it a pier wiki?) and could we easily help with editing a subsection of it to help out?
 
Tim
 
Sent from my iPhone
 
On 8 Aug 2014, at 10:52 am, "phil@highoctane.be" <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
 
I've uploaded the video on my channel as well.
 
 
Phil