> On 20 Apr 2018, at 12:42, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le 20/04/2018 �� 11:44, Esteban Lorenzano a ��crit :
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Apr 2018, at 11:01, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 20/04/2018 �� 09:09, Stephane Ducasse a ��crit :
>>>> The underlying questions (sorry for people that need subtitles) are:
>>>> - how do we have a central place to declare projects
>>>>�� �� ��- right now in Smalltalkhub/list is a nice way to find projects
>>>> with the move to github
>>>>�� �� ��we should get a central place
>>>
>>> One of the issues I have with the Catalog is that it made a mess of
>>> the various MetaRrepo for Pharo... Showing in the end that the single
>>> place one should put a ConfigurationOf for Pharo is the squeak meta repo.
>>
>> not really.
>> if you put your project in the squeak meta repo it will not even be
>> listed (is old stuff and we are not listing those).
>>
>> the idea was to add a project in its corresponding development repo. But
>> is an uncomfortable way, yes (and it was a patch, not meant to last)
>>
>>> That in addition the Catalog doesn't even use the best package
>>> management we have at a given point is just salt rubbed in the wound.
>>
>> that���s a one method change. Instead:
>>
>> loadConfiguration
>> Gofer it
>> url: self repositoryUrl;
>> configurationOf: self name;
>> load
>>
>> loadConfiguration
>> Metacello new
>> repository: self repositoryUrl;
>> configuration: self name;
>> load.
>>
>> when I made catalog, Metacello usage was not so expanded.
>> Yet��� gofer will use metacello to load so, yes, it will use the best
>> package management we have at the moment.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Except if it changed recently, Gofer does not use Metacello behind.
>
> At Synectique when I tried to clean all our configurations because it
> was really hard to update them, I found some problems in the
> configurations but the projects were loading. The reasons was that we
> used Gofer and the bugs of gofer compensated the problems in the
> configurations. After switching to Metacello the projects did not load
> anymore and I needed to fix the configurations to make them clean.
>
> So, if it worked with Gofer but not Metacello, I doubt Gofer use Metacello.

there is no way of loading a configuration/baseline without metacello.

Esteban

>
>>
>> very unlikely.
>> a spec made in STON you just have to modify it each time you do a
>> release (which is exactly what you have to do now with configurations).
>>
>> A crawler will not handle the need to publish a released version.
>>
>> one STON file as I imagine would be something like:
>>
>> project {
>> ���name��� : "blah",
>> ���url��� : "http://github.com/someone/blah",
>> ���lastVersion��� : ���v1.0.0",
>> ���description��� : ���Some project description"
>> }
>>
>> and maybe a couple more. How���s that cryptic?
>> maybe you are confusing things?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cyril Ferlicot
> https://ferlicot.fr
>