On 13 May 2015, at 11:21, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks's Marcus. It is beautiful thing.Is parsing locate errors by "dot"s? I mean how it will parse "3+. 1+2"? It will be super cool if we have only "3+." as error but remains code as good oneYou can just look at�OpalCompiler new� � � � � � � � source: 'method �3+. 1+2';� � � � � � � � useFaultyForParsing: true;� � � � � � � � parse.
with the GT inspector, it has a very nice AST view: