I suggest to have at least one next image - without everything what can be safely unloaded. For the next cleaning and shrinking purposes.
Of course if you want to have similar sequence of automatically build images like the KernelImage.

-- Pavel

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones

Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image, which will be packaged as a one-click image, "Pharo-IDE". And the one where the actual development of Pharo takes place is named Pharo-CORE. Using DEV is ambiguous because its not clear whether this image is supposed to develop applications or Pharo itself.

Adrian


On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:15 , Damien Cassou wrote:

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Is there anything important we missed? Any suggestions?

- review pharo-dev images and make comments so that the official Pharo
image contains some dev tools and pharo-dev becomes useless.

--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ah�: �I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck�. (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project