On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Stan Shepherd <stan.shepherd414@gmail.com> wrote:

Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K
> <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu>wrote:
>
>> It would be cool if it didn't take 3+ hours to load. �2.8 is much more
>> reasonable. �Is 3 that much bigger, or is something wrong with the
>> configuration?
>>
>>
>>
> Yes, it cannot take 3 hours. In my case, it takes no more than 15 minutes.
> Stan: the old machine was with Windows? do you have any antivirus working
> like NOD32 or something like that ?
>
>
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:
>> pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Stan Shepherd
>> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:38 AM
>> To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN]
>> Pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1
>>
>>
>>
>> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stan Shepherd
>> > <stan.shepherd414@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> The only concern is that it took some hours
>> >
>> >
>> > hours ? seriously ?
>> >
>> >
>> >> to download and install Seaside
>> >> (albeit on a slow spare PC). And with occassional network glitches, I
>> >> had to restart a method a few times from a debugger.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, it was 3 hr 29m on the old machine, but I don't know what percent it
>> was halted due to network glitches. It would be really cool if it made
>> say 3
>> retries when its HTTP gets failed.
>>
>> I ran overnight on main machine (Ubuntu 9.04, 3 GHz dual core 1GB ram,
>> nominal 7Gb internet but other downloads running) with message tally - 71
>> minutes.
>>
>> ...Stan
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-tp4278312p4284552.html
>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>

Hi, don't get too hung up on the 3 hr+, it's a really old machine running
Xubuntu I use to test my stuff runs lean. Better to look at the 'normal'
machine's time of 71 minutes, vs 15. Ubuntu, with no nasties running.

I previously reported that I find System update slow.

Mariano, do you run in a folder with a package cache present? I run in a
clean install, so it has to download everything.

The process I use:
create new folder seaside3buildTest2
paste and unzip a Seaside-3.0a5.app.zip one click
http://n2.nabble.com/file/n4285691/loadprocess.txt loadprocess.txt , to have
a full environment
paste and unzip pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.zip
copy pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.image .changes into Resources folder
delete Seaside.image, .changes
edit Seaside.sh to be pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.sh, opening
pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.image
pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.sh open with sh

I find it most convenient to start with a one click image like that.

MessageTally attached.

Also found my first bug:

MessageTally tallySends: [Gofer new
� �squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
� �package: 'ConfigurationOfRefactoringBrowser';
� �load].

Throws code simulation error

in
Project class>>spawnNewProcess

� � � �UIProcess := [
� � � � � � � �[World doOneCycle. �Processor yield. �false] whileFalse: [].
� � � �] newProcess priority: Processor userSchedulingPriority.
� � � �UIProcess resume


...Stan




--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-tp4278312p4285691.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project