2010/8/30 James Ladd <james_ladd@hotmail.com>

Hi Eliot,

I cant use those thinks because im not in Smalltalk at the time, im in Java on the JVM.

Ah, OK. �Now I understand.

�

(Did someone say 'challenge')

I thought about the store question in the shower this morning and I think it means
take the top of the stack but dont pop it.� Please let me know if Im wrong?

That's right. �So...

140 � 10001100 kkkkkkkk jjjjjjjj Push Temp At kkkkkkkk In Temp Vector At: jjjjjjjj

tempVector := activation localAt: kkkkkkkk.

value := tempVector[jjjjjjjj].

activation push: value

141 � 10001101 kkkkkkkk jjjjjjjj Store Temp At kkkkkkkk In Temp Vector At: jjjjjjjj

tempVector := activation localAt: kkkkkkkk.

tempVector[jjjjjjjj] := activation stackTop.

142 � 10001110 kkkkkkkk jjjjjjjj Pop and Store Temp At kkkkkkkk In Temp Vector At: jjjjjjjj

�

tempVector := activation localAt: kkkkkkkk.

tempVector[jjjjjjjj] := activation stackTop.

activation popStack.

Clear?

If so, I'd be very happy to improve my documentation based on your reading and my clarification.

best,

Eliot

Rgs, James.

> Hi James,
>
> perhaps you could use the implementations of
> ContextPart pushRemoteTemp:inVectorAt: popIntoRemoteTemp:inVectorAt:
> storeIntoRemoteTemp:inVectorAt:
> (& Interpreter pushRemoteTemp:inVectorAt: popIntoRemoteTemp:inVectorAt: if
> you have them to hand) as the spec and check the documentation. The intent
> is that k..k is the index of the temp containing the remote vector and j..j
> is the index in the remote temp vector.
>
> cheers
> Eliot
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project