On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:55 PM, nullPointer
<epicfan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I believe is best create another from scratch,
>> but with WPF like model and XAML
>> as UI definition language. That is for people with best knowledges.
>
> I'm not convinced that we cannot learn from your development.
Because is needed change the current exposition to something like that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-T-yF3tXCc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyO7v06xlWM&feature=related
Forget for a moment that is from M$ ��XD ��The wonderful of that is the language
for define the UI interface, XAML, where you can describe not only basic
propertys of "morph" like colors or positions, but too animations, mouseOver
effects, timers, movies... And you can use editors of XAML, external from
environment, for create more rich UIs.
I don't think WPF/XAML/whatever is good or bad (indeed I don't care :). But I think there's lot of value in having UIBuilder with "old mechanism" *now*. Do you think we can easily get it out of experimental / alpha state ? Or is there design/architecture mistakes such as thinking of creating applications with it is harmful ?��
For the future, something based on Morphic 3 isn't the right way ?
Cheers,
Laurent��
The current UIBuilder is based on old mechanism for build views, and surely with
a lot of errors. I believe that that is the best direction for something more
new and correct.