I know Smallworks company uses FTP for all their repositories. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Geert Claes <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:geert.wl.claes@gmail.com">geert.wl.claes@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
I just made a few diagrams trying to explain how Monticello/Metacello works<br>
as part of the collaborActive book<br>
(<a href="http://book.pharo-project.org/book/introduction/Repository" target="_blank">http://book.pharo-project.org/book/introduction/Repository</a>) and I was just<br>
wondering if anyone actually uses Monticello repository types like FTP,<br>
SMTP, ... ? �Would it make things easier to just keep Directory/Cache and<br>
HTTP and maybe GOODS as standard repository types?<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/Monticello-repository-types-tp2295053p2295053.html" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/Monticello-repository-types-tp2295053p2295053.html</a><br>
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Pharo-project mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr">Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project" target="_blank">http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>