Am 24.11.2013 um 21:31 schrieb Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>:

I am using Pharo 3.0 in production and it is highly reliable.

So it is not just reliable but highly reliable? What does it mean and what do you call "using in production"?

Norbert
Doru


On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements.


Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That may be too much.

I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that are changing in all corners.

Phil



---
Philippe Back
Dramatic Performance Improvements
Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback

High Octane SPRL
rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - http://spamcast.libsyn.com
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller
 



On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, St��phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi guys

It would be good not to clean without a clear vision.
For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu of a window.
Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point:

        - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion, Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, ���..
        and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage Pharo with configurations.

        - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the part of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon
        on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because
        we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10 packages and 10 classes more in the system.
        I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration inside the image. To me this is totally stupid
        not to do it.

        - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we will remove the old browser
        but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs outside the image to see if you succeed.

So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes.

Stef




--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"