On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre@bergel.eu> wrote:
1) There are packages that should NOT be part of the core, but they are not also dev tools. For example, ObjectTracer, ObjectViewer, Morph examples, Sound, ImageSegment (?) etc. So...where do we put them ?
I would imagine to have each package in a dedicated SqueakSource repository, pretty much the same way we have OB, RB, NewInspector.
Yes, actually, the repository was alrady created in SqueakSource under the name of PharoNonCorePackages.
�
>From what you wrote, I understand that you wish to create an intermediary layer, PharoNonCorePackages
In that case:
Pharo = PharoVeryCore + PharoNonCorePackages + PharoDev
Is this what you intend ?
Exactly.
�
Ideally, I do not see a valid reason for PharoNonCorePackages to be: each package can happily live in its own SS rep.
Yes, they can also live in their own repository. But I think it is easier to have the all together in the same repository. Mostly because I don't think there will be too much packages for the same repository. I mean, all those packages are little and seem not to be very related to each other...so it is not like a big project where you need a repository because you have a lot of packages for the same project. In this case we will probably have one package.
�
Moreover, this could easily create confusion.
Why ?� What is the difference with the Pharo repository for example ?
�
But for practical reason, it could make your life easier.
yes!
�
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel �http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.