This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements.

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html

Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That may be too much.

I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that are changing in all corners.

Phil

---

Philippe Back

Dramatic Performance Improvements

Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027

Mail:phil@highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu

Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback

Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos

High Octane SPRL

rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member -�http://consortium.pharo.org/

Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -�http://spamcast.libsyn.com

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller

�

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

Hi guys

It would be good not to clean without a clear vision.
For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu of a window.
Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point:

� � � � - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion, Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, �..
� � � � and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage Pharo with configurations.

� � � � - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the part of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon
� � � � on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because
� � � � we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10 packages and 10 classes more in the system.
� � � � I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration inside the image. To me this is totally stupid
� � � � not to do it.

� � � � - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we will remove the old browser
� � � � but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs outside the image to see if you succeed.

So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes.

Stef