�I'm a little surprised with the current SortedCollection #= implementation... it is:
= aSortedCollection
"Answer true if my and aSortedCollection's species are the same,
and if our blocks are the same, and if our elements are the same."
self species = aSortedCollection species ifFalse: [^ false].
sortBlock = aSortedCollection sortBlock
ifTrue: [^ super = aSortedCollection]
ifFalse: [^ false]
�
and my surprise is because it compares the sortBlocks that makes the simplest case to fail like this one:
(SortedCollection sortBlock: [ :a :b | a < b ]) = (SortedCollection sortBlock: [ :a :b | a < b ])
One could argue that if we remove the sortBlock comparison then :
(SortedCollection sortBlock: [ :a :b | a < b ]) = (SortedCollection sortBlock: [ :a :b | a > b ])
would return true... but is that wrong? ... or is the philosophy to use the message #hasEqualElements: on this cases?
BTW, VisualWorks implementation is the same as pharo, but the BlockClosure>>= is different and that's why it works as at least I expected :-)
Bye,
Hernan
--
Hern�n Wilkinson
Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching
Phone: +54 - 011 -�6091 - 3125
Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207
email: hernan.wilkinson@10Pines.com
site:�http://www.10Pines.com
Address: Alem 693, Floor 5 B, Buenos Aires, Argentina