Hi Norbert��

2018-05-25 23:50 GMT+03:00 Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name>:
Really?? Don���t you think the overhead is massive compared to the gain?

I am sure that you were agreed with this when we push Beacon two yeas ago. But look at my explanation in previous mail.
��

Norbert
> Am 25.05.2018 um 21:08 schrieb Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, we want to have the concrete loggers managed with separate baselines. I would also put them in individual repositories.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> On May 25, 2018, at 5:58 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2018-05-25 17:21 GMT+03:00 Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl>:
>> Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I was looking at Beacon again to prepare integration. Some changes was
>>> needed in baseline for better granularity. So I send pull request because I
>>> have no permissions.
>>>
>>> But now I remember that we had idea to integrate only core part of Beacon
>>> which requires MemoryLogger and TranscriptLogger. And we wanted to manage
>>> logger backends using separate baselines. So we need separate repos to have
>>> separate versioning.
>>
>> Why would you want separate baselines for that? And on top of that separate
>> repos?
>>
>> Because when you will fix or improve Beacon-SysLog you will probably do not want to update Beacon-Core version which will force you to update Pharo (where SysLog is not loaded).
>>
>>
>> Stephan
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
> one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
>
>
>
>
>