I see that you haven't clicked on a 17K long string that opens a 17K items long tree of characters with nice icons and makes your image bloat to 200+MB in size.


--> 223 162 288 bytes for XXXX.image

Look: (in 2.0 the explorer just shows a piece of text)

Inline image 1
.



But I hate the 'all inst vars' field, who uses that and for what ??

On 13 Mar 2014, at 20:16, phil@highoctane.be wrote:

I agree with that.

I was inspecting a ZnResponse yesterday and it was very hard to see the contents etc.

A general pain. I was clicking on the "inspect" option to see what the real content was. I was�cursing a lot.

Phil





On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sean P. DeNigris�<sean@clipperadams.com>�wrote:
I'm glad we're re-inventing the tools! And, I'm struggling with this tool in
its current form...

As others have mentioned, the "class" pseudo-variable is confusing, but here
are some that I find worse:
- The receiver does not change with the selection. For me, this was a key
feature of the explorer.
- It does not properly update e.g. if you are inspecting a class containing
a dictionary and add an item to the dictionary, collapsing and expanding the
dictionary node does not show the added item. It seems you must open an
entirely new inspector.
- If you toggle from EyeTreeInspector to EyeInspector, your code in the
bottom pane is lost



-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:�http://forum.world.st/EyeTreeInspector-not-ready-for-prime-time-tp4748966.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.