0.00000000549181 seconds per message is just insanely low number . This is not even in the realm of nanoseconds. ��Is this number real ? Because I am very skeptical that one can get this kind of performance from a dynamic language even with a JIT VM.��

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Camille Teruel <camille.teruel@gmail.com> wrote:

A spur image :) ��awesome !!
Thanks Esteban & Guille!
I'll start adapting the new class builder to Spur next wednesday when I come back from holidays.

On 2 juil. 2014, at 16:13, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I��ve been working on prepare Pharo to run with the new Spur VM�� and finally this week Guille and I sit together and make a huge advance :)
> here a screenshot of pharo 4 running with spur:

> <Screen Shot 2014-07-02 at 15.58.17.png>

> for more information, same image before migration, with a regular cogvm gives this numbers: '1297023432 bytecodes/sec; 161029354 sends/sec��, so that means that the tiny benchmarks run at 166% the speed of the old vm��
> Of course this is just one benchmark, but I��m very impressed :)
>
> Now, it is still not usable but I��m confident I can put a jenkins job to work very soon :)
>
> Esteban
>
> ps: before you start asking: Spur WILL NOT be available for Pharo3, it will be part of Pharo4.
>
>
>