Hi Guys!
No news on this bug? It's really annoying I can't see the timestamp of a
method.
Thanks
Davide

Paul DeBruicker wrote

--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html

+1 I'd like to see it fixed.
It's broken since P8 and still pending in P9.

@everyone Please upvote it :-)
Noury
On Feb 4 2021, at 5:36 pm, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users pharo-users@lists.pharo.org wrote:

I went in and updated the corresponding github issue (
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/7283). The tool is really
useful, and it would be nice to have the author and timestamp in place
again.

👏
Davide

Kasper Osterbye wrote

--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html

Oh, yes/ That is one of the things I most love about ENVY and miss in
everything else.
What is the change history of this method, class, package, etc.?

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:09 PM Kasper Osterbye kasper.osterbye@gmail.com
wrote:

Hi all,

While the timestamp for the in-image change is, indeed, missing and needs to be fixed, I want to point that we are abandoning the in-image author tracking by method and replacing it with the git history (which wive you also authorship and timestamp by commit).
This method commit history is already there (since Pharo 8) and can be queried with the "history" button in the minitoolbar of calypso, same place where you have the access to the version browser.
Yes, it is not the same, but it fulfills correctly (and improves it, since it gives you the whole method history, not just what you have in image) the old version functionality, which however will remain as a track of in-image changes, but without the author (since is not needed).

Even more, all the Author infrastructure is target for removal in next versions of Pharo (just not right now :P)
cheers!
Esteban

On Feb 5 2021, at 9:16 am, Richard Sargent richard.sargent@gemtalksystems.com wrote:

change history for method is already there (as explained in my previous mail).
for class and package level is something I always wanted to implement (class level is particularly easy to implement, with tonel format) but I didn't find the time to do it.
Volunteers to implement are welcome! ;)

Esteban
On Feb 5 2021, at 9:16 am, Richard Sargent richard.sargent@gemtalksystems.com wrote:

Thanks, Estaban.
I realize that you are not offering a solution. But, you are recognizing the benefit of one.

On February 5, 2021 12:33:14 AM PST, Esteban Lorenzano estebanlm@netc.eu wrote:

Based on your comments Esteban, I have suggested to close the corresponding
issue 7283. Closer integration to git from within the image sounds
promising.