[Pharo-users] OSProcess / OSSubprocess / LibC uniqueInstance

Albrecht Baur baur.albrecht at googlemail.com
Wed Feb 20 02:30:44 EST 2019


Nice! This helps -> thanks for the explanation.

Albrecht

On 19.02.19 21:10, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> Yeah, readme is out of date. 64 bits is working: 
> https://github.com/pharo-contributions/OSSubprocess/issues/22
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:48 PM Alistair Grant <akgrant0710 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:akgrant0710 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 13:45, Albrecht Baur via Pharo-users
>     <pharo-users at lists.pharo.org <mailto:pharo-users at lists.pharo.org>>
>     wrote:
>     >
>     > Thank you.
>     >
>     > The Metacello snippet helps. It loads a newer version than that
>     from the catalog browser.
>     >
>     >
>     > But 2 more questions:
>     >
>     > 1.: Is there a reason not to use just ...
>     >
>     > LibC uniqueInstance system: 'zip -r 123.zip zipme/'
>
>     You don't have the same level of control over the process, can't pipe
>     stdio, it introduces issues with interrupts (SIGINT, SIGQUIT), etc.
>
>
>     > And 2.: Is it ok to use OSSubprocess on in 64 bit images even
>     though the documentation says it doesn't work ? (but it does)
>     >
>     > -> https://github.com/pharo-contributions/OSSubprocess#installation
>
>     That's a surprise.  Yes, OSSubprocess is officially supported on 64
>     bits, the readme is out of date.
>
>     HTH,
>     Alistair
>
>
>
> -- 
> Mariano
> https://twitter.com/MartinezPeck
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20190220/4a847817/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-users mailing list