[Pharo-users] Stability of Pharo 7 vs 6?

Ben Coman btc at openinworld.com
Sat Feb 16 11:27:25 EST 2019


I'm not on a Mac to test, but it might be worth browsing the top few of
these..
https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=can%27t+allocate+region+securely&s=created&type=Issues

cheers -ben

On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 20:10, Tim Mackinnon <tim at testit.works> wrote:

> I’ve actually being using both - but 32bit has generally been considered
> the older more stable cousin (until Pharo 6 - where it was felt that 64bit
> was now just as stable).
>
> I only mentioned it - because the zeroconf example that has crashed a few
> of my several times - was 32 bit (but I have also had 64 bit crash too.
> Probably a good experiment to try zeroconf with the 64bit variation and
> load my baseline as well).
>
> I just think we might have an easily reproducable (and small) example that
> shows this issue that many have experienced a bit more randomly.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20190217/d841a468/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-users mailing list