[Pharo-users] Non-greedy RegEx?
estebanlm at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 02:33:51 EST 2019
Yes, Pharo regex implementation is very naive.
We will be moving to a PCRE binding to match outside world standards but we have not had the time to work on it :(
> On 5 Feb 2019, at 00:27, Manuel Leuenberger <leuenberger at inf.unibe.ch> wrote:
> I just noticed that the Pharo regexes do not understand non-greedy matches. A regex engine to be PCRE is kind of essential, not having '.*?' to be a parseable and working regex is a bummer. Are there any more powerful regex engines around for Pharo? I could not find any.
More information about the Pharo-users