[Pharo-users] Loading Local Repositories with Iceberg

Peter Uhnák i.uhnak at gmail.com
Mon Jun 4 14:03:29 EDT 2018


>  but I’m trying to understand what is the easiest option to avoid
gotcha’s (that more advanced guys can better cope with)

I guess the question is whether you want to handle conflict resolutions
directly with git, or through iceberg.

I've been using separate clones for each image for a long time and it works
well. Especially when you are also modifying non-smalltalk files in each
clone.

Peter

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:

> Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> .
> > P7 will force you to be in the right branch or you will not be able to
> > do… almost anything :)
> > you can have two (or ten) images opened at once and work on them, but at
> > a moment you will need to “repair” each image to commit.
>
> Ah, nice. How is that guarded against concurrent access, live-lock &
> dead-lock?
>
> Stephan
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20180604/ddeeed2c/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-users mailing list