[Pharo-users] Pharo Docs website broken

Dimitris Chloupis kilon.alios at gmail.com
Mon Jan 11 09:41:58 EST 2016

Personally I would prefer if Esteban kept working on documenting the new
FFI. Thats a top priority doc wise, the rest can wait.

Στις Δευ, 11 Ιαν 2016 - 15:57 ο χρήστης Johan Fabry <jfabry at dcc.uchile.cl>

> I better understand the reason for existence of pharodocs, thanks! I also
> understand that you want to keep it.
> BUT: please keep in mind that having bad documentation is actually worse
> than not having any documentation at all. So ideally you would regenerate
> the site tonight before you go to sleep. :-)
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:41, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com> wrote:
> well… maintenance is (usually) just run the generation process.
> Some months ago Guille made a simplified version and I was thinking on
> just load it and execute it… they go to sleep :)
> the reasons for pharodocs to be there are not so important and nothing
> will change a lot if removed. But I would keep it anyway, if possible.
> Esteban
> On 11 Jan 2016, at 14:37, Johan Fabry <jfabry at dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
> I never used Pharodoc, I don’t really see the point. And apparently I am
> not alone. So, I have a provocative question: why don’t you just remove it?
> It is broken now and it will take energy to fix, and this energy can be
> much better spent elsewhere. Plus it will take maintenance time and energy
> at some point in the future, it is probable that it will break again at
> some point, since the www behaves like this. Just get rid of this burden.
> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
> Johan Fabry   -   http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
> PLEIAD and RyCh labs  -  Computer Science Department (DCC)  -  University
> of Chile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20160111/580cee68/attachment.html>

More information about the Pharo-users mailing list