[Pharo-users] Interogation about recursivity or sequential

stepharo stepharo at free.fr
Sat Jan 9 03:01:35 EST 2016


I propose this as an exercise.
Now I was not aware that we have doubleLinkedList in the system.

I do not get why DoubleLinkedList is packaged in System-Caching and not 
Collections-DoubleLinkedList?
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17360/DoubleLinkedList-should-be-packaged-in-Collections-DoubleLinkedList 

Stef


Le 5/1/16 02:50, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
> Wouldn't it be better to improve the current (Double)LinkedList 
> instead of creating new ones? DLL had some improvements recently and I 
> am not aware that it's missing something.
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu 
> <mailto:sven at stfx.eu>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Yann,
>
>     > On 04 Jan 2016, at 22:11, Yann Dubois <yann59.dubois at gmail.com
>     <mailto:yann59.dubois at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     > Hello World, Happy new year 2016 !
>
>     And to you too.
>
>     > I actually work on an integration of a double linked list on
>     Pharo and I have a little interogation.
>     > It's better to use recursivity or senquential algorithm ?
>
>     Recursive is often cleaner, sequential is often faster.
>
>     > Yann
>
>     There is already a (minimal) DoubleLinkedList in the image ...
>
>     Sven
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20160109/4fd48630/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-users mailing list