[Pharo-users] Another pass on catalog web-site (Styling)

Yuriy Tymchuk yuriy.tymchuk at me.com
Mon Oct 12 06:34:48 EDT 2015


Why does it show that QA has only conf. for pharo 5 if it also has one for Pharo 4?

Uko

> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the styling… still a lot to do but is looking better and better: http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh)
> 
> But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your configurations with catalog information as described here: http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers
> Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under “Unstable” tag. 
> 
> The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is  A LOT of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used :(
> 
> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS!
> 
> cheers, 
> Esteban





More information about the Pharo-users mailing list