[Pharo-users] Dynamic graph exploration - seeking input on idiomatic smalltalk [LONG]

Patrik Sundberg patrik.sundberg at gmail.com
Tue Jul 24 14:32:37 EDT 2012

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:14 PM, S Krish
<krishnamachari.sudhakar at gmail.com>wrote:

> I doubt I can understand the whole of your idea and would aver that a
> working model / code is lot better for anyone equally interested to load ,
> try and comment on it.
> The goal is big and nice, utility not yet comprehensible fully, but
> perhaps a working code will clarify a bit more again to some one in the
> similar line of action.
> Go ahead and let the code + screen shots do the talk.. you might have good
> feedback
yeah, you're right. it's very abstract for someone not in my head - I've
been thinking about these concepts for years and i'm "just" trying to
translate it into a good smalltalk implementation. i've got a ruby
implementation from before but have a hunch smalltalk will be the better
fit/experience as soon as I have grokked enough to turn concepts to reality
and work effectively in pharo.

i'll just start poking at it and see how it goes.


On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Patrik Sundberg <patrik.sundberg at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Patrik Sundberg wrote:
>>> I've done a bit more studying and I think a combination of
>>> SystemAnnouncer events to catch method changes, pragmas to mark "graph
>>> nodes" and use of method wrappers could create a very nice way to shield
>>> the user of my graph API from thinking of identity caches and graph node
>>> details.
>>> The other cool feature of use is the new class builder and custom slots.
>>> For nodes that are not dynamic/calculations (what I call properties or
>>> relationship nodes) I think custom slots could be interesting but need to
>>> test out some ideas to organize thoughts. Obviously won't work for
>>> calculated/dynamic nodes since I need ability to take arguments for those
>>> and can't map to a slot. In principle all I'm after is to have an identity
>>> map and a graph (DAG) in the background whose management is hidden away
>>> from user so he can focus on domain logic and not graph stuff.
>>> Going on holiday for a week and a bit, shall start experimenting after
>>> that.
>> Ok, so I'm back on this. My first idea is to do this:
>> - Every node in my graph is either a piece of data (I call it a leaf or a
>> property node) or a node depending on other nodes that perform a
>> calculation (I call it a calc node for now)
>> - All the nodes are part of an identity map which means a node can only
>> exist in one copy and any relations and dependencies will sit between these
>> unique nodes
>> - I'd like to shield the user from all the identify map stuff etc as much
>> as possible.
>> - A smalltalk object is an instance of a class, and it can participate in
>> the graph by providing leaf nodes and calc nodes. Those nodes are
>> associated with the messages of the object.
>> - I have some ideas for how to bootstrap the dependency graph between
>> nodes etc and I'm not worried about that bit (on first calculation create
>> structure via reflection and a dependency stack)
>> - The explicit and uggly way I can do things are like this:
>> Foo>>addOneTo: aNumberNode
>>    ^GraphManager instance
>>        getCalcNode: #addOneTo:
>>        for: self
>>        withArgs: #( aNumberNode )
>>        block: [ :node |
>>           node value + 1
>>        ]
>>   - pretend this goes and asks the identity cache and either gets an
>> existing leaf node for the addOneTo: for this object for a particular
>> argument, or if none exist it creates it and attaches the block as the
>> calculation to perform when #value is sent to the node
>>   - let's say 'foo' is an instance of Foo class, then 'foo addOneTo: baz'
>> refers to the calc node, and '(foo addOneTo: baz) value' refers to the
>> value of the calculation
>> - What I was thinking here was that I could use method wrappers to hide
>> all the junk, like this:
>> Foo>>addOneTo: aNode
>>    <calcNode>
>>    aNode value + 1
>> - I listen to all method add/update/remove announcements, and when a
>> method that is marked with the <calcNode> pragma is involved, what I do is
>> create a MethodWrapper that takes care of all the uggly stuff to get/create
>> the graph node via the identity cache and as #value method for the node
>> uses the method implementation the user originally provided (and replaces
>> the entry in the method dictionary)
>> Does that sound doable? The browsers etc wont go nuts?
>> If I do that, will system browsers still show the original source for the
>> method even though I've replaced it via the method dictionary and
>> MethodWrapper?
>> I'm assuming stack traces and debugging etc will be just fine, will just
>> have the "hidden" node logic via the MethodWrappers included in the call
>> stack.
>> I'll give that type of setup a go, just wanted to throw it out there and
>> hear if it's an obviously terrible idea first.
>> P.S. for leaf nodes (or any node not requiring an argument to be
>> provided) I think I could use custom slots instead of method wrappers and
>> do the same kind of logic as the method wrapper would do in the slot
>> instead. I'll worry about that later.
>>  On Jul 6, 2012 1:16 PM, "Patrik Sundberg" wrote:
>>>  On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:38 PM, S Krish  wrote:
>>>> You should read as much as you can about Kapital of JPMC. It does more
>>>>> or less what you describe for esoteric Prime Interest Derivatives and very
>>>>> scalably ..
>>>> I've heard of that one. Never worked at JPM so haven't seen it first
>>>> hand though. I'll see what I can find. In terms of concepts I'm fully on
>>>> top of it (have a background with other companies using similar ideas, but
>>>> not in smalltalk but their own in-house language). So the good part is that
>>>> I know exactly what I want conceptually, but I'm not stuck into smalltalk
>>>> enough to know the natural way to implement the concepts. It may sound like
>>>> a huge endeavour but I've done a lot of it in ruby and even as a side
>>>> project to my real job we're talking about a couple of months to have
>>>> something useful.
>>>>> I doubt if there is much in the public domain, but the fact that
>>>>> Kapital is the golden standard in this product line talks highly of why
>>>>> Smalltalk is THE platform for this kind of product.
>>>> I wouldn't say it's the golden standard, that's taking it a bit far,
>>>> there are others that I rate higher bit I'm also biased :) But I do agree
>>>> that smalltalk is a reasonably natural platform for these types of
>>>> concepts, hence why I'm exploring it.
>>>>> It would be nice to have a Pharo based derivative product that can
>>>>> easily beat Ruby/ Java / .Net at this dynamic visualization using standard
>>>>> browsers, where Nautilus too can serve your purpose.. or a home grown tree
>>>>> based browser.../ Grids..
>>>> That's my hunch, that the tooling work would be much cut down. In my
>>>> current ruby mockup I'm kind of creating a poor man's image like experience
>>>> - it's jruby on the JVM, vim + vim-slime to send code fragments to the
>>>> "runtime", git, and most likely homegrown GUI to navigate the graph and
>>>> play with it (not done anything on that yet). I'll be keeping jruby as a
>>>> dear tool as right now it's a fantastic glue tool in terms of interacting
>>>> with anything out there in the world (i.e. I can easily work with the
>>>> bloomberg java API), but I'm very keen to explore pharo for my graph +
>>>> tooling around that.
>>>> (slight tangent - coming from outside the smalltalk world it'd be HUGE
>>>> to me to have git backend for packages and use of github for collaboration.
>>>> seen that mentioned in other threads. I think it'd be HUGE for community's
>>>> ability to attract more people).
>>>>> Once I have completed my run at a PharoTabletIDE/ PharoMorphicView
>>>>> framework, I would love to collaborate on your endeavour to see if it can
>>>>> be modelled on it and exposed..
>>>> Cool. Early days yet and we'll see where I end up. Not familiar with
>>>> those projects, I shall take a look.
>>>> Patrik
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Patrik Sundberg wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> First of all, sorry for the long email as my first email to the list.
>>>>>> Hopefully some people will find it an interesting discussion :)
>>>>>> I'm a long time programmer that has been studying smalltalk and pharo
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> the last year. It's a beautiful language I'm liking the image style of
>>>>>> development a whole lot. I've been looking for a good test case to
>>>>>> try out
>>>>>> in pharo and I've got something in mind. I've used ruby since around
>>>>>> 2000
>>>>>> and given how much it has been inspired by smalltalk it's not a big
>>>>>> leap.
>>>>>> My real job is being a commodities trader but I build my own tools and
>>>>>> something I'm always working on is improved risk and pricing tools.
>>>>>> Lots of
>>>>>> that comes down to 2 things:
>>>>>> 1. evaluating a "function" (in a general sense) with inputs that are
>>>>>> picked
>>>>>> depending on time. e.g. I want to price a security and I want to pick
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> prices for time X as inputs to the pricing model.
>>>>>> 2. calculating a derivative of the "function" above with respect to
>>>>>> inputs
>>>>>> What I tend to do in order to keep things consistent by design, plus
>>>>>> add
>>>>>> natural caching, is create a calculation graph. I define all the
>>>>>> dependencies and create an in-memory graph where each node is unique
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> an identity map. I then perform a calculation where the calculations
>>>>>> trickle
>>>>>> down the graph starting from the node I'm interested in down all it's
>>>>>> dependencies. To calculate the derivative I then find the node
>>>>>> representing
>>>>>> the input I want the derivative with respect to and use finite
>>>>>> differences,
>>>>>> e.g. move it's value, and recalculate the top level node. On the
>>>>>> second
>>>>>> valuation of the graph only the parts that are affected by me
>>>>>> changing that
>>>>>> 1 value will need to be evaluated, the rest is cached an unaffected.
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> makes it very easy to ask questions like "How much will I be affected
>>>>>> by X
>>>>>> changing by Y?" since I can take the top level node of the graph,
>>>>>> search for
>>>>>> X, and if found change it by Y and recalculate.
>>>>>> How the graph is constructed in memory depends on time (and a few
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> things). I always store all previous states of the world so that I can
>>>>>> recreate any calculation I did in the past. Very useful for diagnosing
>>>>>> problem. Hence if I for example change what model I use to model
>>>>>> something,
>>>>>> that change is recorded in a way such that if I set my "time" to
>>>>>> before the
>>>>>> change happened the graph will get created as it would have with the
>>>>>> old
>>>>>> model, and for a time after the change it'll create a different graph
>>>>>> reflecting the new model. Hence the graph can only be known at
>>>>>> runtime when
>>>>>> the "time" etc is known.
>>>>>> I currently have a ruby mockup of this. It's a DSL that looks like
>>>>>> this:
>>>>>> ----------- EXAMPLE
>>>>>> class ExampleObject
>>>>>>   include GraphEntity # includes a module with functionality for
>>>>>> objects
>>>>>> participating in the graph, including #property and #calc used below
>>>>>>   property :foo do
>>>>>>     123 # this is the default value for this property which will be
>>>>>> used
>>>>>> before a value has been set and saved
>>>>>>   end
>>>>>>   calc :bar do |arg|
>>>>>>     foo.value + arg     # take the value of the arg property and add
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> argument given to the calculation node
>>>>>>   end
>>>>>> end
>>>>>> o = ExampleObject.new
>>>>>> # this will kick of the graph being built in memory and setup the
>>>>>> dependency
>>>>>> between bar and foo nodes
>>>>>> o.bar(1).value  # -> 124
>>>>>> # this will be a "cache lookup" since nothing in the graph that bar
>>>>>> depends
>>>>>> on has changed (i.e. the "expensive" calculation is not performed
>>>>>> again
>>>>>> o.bar(1).value  # -> 124
>>>>>> o.foo.set_value(2)
>>>>>> o.bar(1).value  # -> 125, realizes that foo changed and performs a
>>>>>> recalc
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To accomplish this I use dynamic code generation like the below for
>>>>>> #property and similar for other types of nodes:
>>>>>>         # NOTE: it's a class level method, hence how I can call it
>>>>>> when
>>>>>> defining the class in the example
>>>>>>         def property(name, time = CdrEnv.instance.time, &block)
>>>>>>           clear_property(name)
>>>>>>           getter_method_body = <<-EOF
>>>>>>             def #{name}
>>>>>>               init_block =
>>>>>> self.class.property_init_block_for(:#{name})
>>>>>>               time_for_property =
>>>>>> self.class.property_time_dependency_for(:#{name})
>>>>>>               if init_block.nil?
>>>>>>                 CdrEnv.instance.get_property_node(self, :#{name},
>>>>>> time_for_property)
>>>>>>               else
>>>>>>                 CdrEnv.instance.get_property_node(self, :#{name},
>>>>>> time_for_property, &init_block)
>>>>>>               end
>>>>>>             end
>>>>>>           EOF
>>>>>>           setter_method_body = <<-EOF
>>>>>>             def #{name.to_s}=(value)
>>>>>>               #{name.to_s}.mutate(value)
>>>>>>             end
>>>>>>           EOF
>>>>>>           class_eval getter_method_body
>>>>>>           class_eval setter_method_body
>>>>>>           register_property_node(name, time, &block)
>>>>>>         end
>>>>>> Don't worry about the details or all the unfamiliar ruby, the main
>>>>>> point is
>>>>>> that it creates an instance method that uses the singleton
>>>>>> CdrEnv.instance
>>>>>> to either get or create the node representing the property from the
>>>>>> graph
>>>>>> identity cache depending on if it exists or not.
>>>>>> From a tooling point of view I think I'd love to work with this kind
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> thing in pharo. Building my own browsers for inspecting and debugging
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> dynamic graph should be very good fit. However, I'd appreciate some
>>>>>> pointers
>>>>>> to idiomatic smalltalk to attack this kind of problem in terms of
>>>>>> implementing the graph itself - I obviously want the user (even if
>>>>>> it's me)
>>>>>> to just have to focus on the domain model and hide as much as
>>>>>> possible of
>>>>>> the graph bits under the covers the same way I've done with the code
>>>>>> generation stuff in my ruby example.
>>>>>> Any input into this would be much appreciated,
>>>>>> Patrik
>>>>>> P.S.
>>>>>> Btw, the persistence backend for this is the neo4j graph database,
>>>>>> but it's
>>>>>> fronted by a service slotting into my own service framework built
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> ZeroMQ and services exchanging messages in protobuf format. One can
>>>>>> use it
>>>>>> from any language as long as one can send protobuf messages over
>>>>>> zeromq. I
>>>>>> see there's a zeromq ffi library available on SS that I'll check out,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> I'm not finding a protobuf implementation. It'd be easy enough for me
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> port a ruby protobuf implementation but I may as well ask if someone
>>>>>> has
>>>>>> already done any work on protobuf for smalltalk?
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>> http://forum.world.st/Dynamic-graph-exploration-seeking-input-on-idiomatic-smalltalk-LONG-tp4638702.html
>>>>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at
>>>>>> Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20120724/ef83ee61/attachment.html>

More information about the Pharo-users mailing list